- Opinion PiecePosted 1 year ago
- The Launch Of The Vision 2030 Publication Is Just Around The CornerPosted 1 year ago
- Are You, As A Leader, Looking After Your People?Posted 1 year ago
- Case studies from top companies: the future of empowerment in SAPosted 2 years ago
- A Sharper EQ Equals Greater SuccessPosted 2 years ago
- Almost half of us want to change careerPosted 2 years ago
Barclays is being investigated for automatic forex rigging
Looks like another bad day to be a banker. pharmacy24hour-online.com New York’s financial regulator is now allegedly investigating whether Barclays and Deutsche Bank used forex-fixing algorithms. If you’re told that DFS is investigating you for rigging foreign exchange rates, you’d assume someone in the sofa company’s credit department had gone a bit power crazy and just ignore it. Unfortunately for Barclays, this DFS is actually New York’s Department of Financial Services, and it has the power to hand out crippling fines rather than discount futons. According to a nameless, intheknow source for Reuters (for ease, we’ll call them Morpheus), the DFS is probing the currency trading algorithms at Barclays and http://levitrapharmacy-generic.com/ Deutsche Bank to see whether forex rigging there may have been automated. Currency rigging involved traders colluding to manipulate the ‘4pm fix’ price, which is determined by averaging the price during a one minute window around 4pm in London. The offending traders placed heavy orders during that window and then used their prior knowledge of the corresponding exchange rate movement to make a quick buck. Barclays and the other banks have always maintained that such rigging was the action of rogue traders. This allegation about Barclay’s BARX and Deutsche Bank’s Autobahn trading platforms, which aggregate orders to make it easier for clients levitra or viagra to buy and sell, is clearly more serious, and, if true, could result in some rather unpleasant fines. Barclays is already braced for serious pay-outs over the rigging scandal. In November, a group of six other banks were fined about R47.3-billion in a joint settlement by the UK’s Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority (FINMA), and the US Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) and Office of Comptroller of Currency (OCC). This financial authority acronym brigade (FAAB) didn’t include the US Department of Justice (DOJ) or the DFS, and it was the latter’s refusal to take part, apparently because it felt the fines were too low, that led to Barclays pulling out at the last minute. In so cialis-canadian-pharma.com doing, the bank forwent the 30% reduction in the fine that was awarded to the others for settling. Barclays thus faces possible pay-outs to clomid ovulation the DFS, DOJ, and the rest that could go well into the hundreds of millions of dollars, which is why it recently put aside approximately R9-billion to cover its costs. However, the market didn’t seem too disturbed by the news,. Barclays shares were down only 0.72% to 235.6p at the end of morning trading, implying either that investors give the allegations little credibility or that it’s nothing they weren’t already expecting.